Interview Process
Respondents
I collected data from five participants for my study: one male and four females. Due to ethical concerns, which I will discuss in a later section, I have not disclosed their names. Instead, I have referred to them by numbersRespondent One: Male with 30 years’ composting experience, using a self-built system at his allotment. Empties the kitchen waste bin every 2–3 weeks.
Prepared Compost– (Respondent 1 Composting Facility)
Respondent Two: Eco-conscious female, previously composted in her backyard but stopped after moving to an apartment.
Respondent Three: Female aware of composting from grandparents’ backyard, but lacks tools in her flat.
Respondent Four: Female with childhood composting experience in Australia, but hasn’t composted in shared flat due to space and odor issues.
Respondent Five: Plant enthusiast wanting to compost but restricted by property rules; instead, disposes of scraps in an empty lot for natural composting.
Interview time lasted 15–30 minutes, with fixed questions guiding follow-ups.
Interview outcome:
The study revealed that home composting offers significant benefits such as greater control over the process, reduced carbon footprint, and producing higher-quality, nutrient-rich compost compared to commercial products. However, challenges include the considerable time, effort, and space required, as well as issues with pests and seasonal slowdowns, particularly in urban settings with limited outdoor areas. Food waste management at home is often hindered by odors, quickly filling bins, and a lack of proper sorting, especially in flats. While mechanical composting systems offer potential convenience, concerns over energy use, cost, and space remain. Participants suggested that local council support through regular compost collection, incentives, and public education could enhance composting adoption and waste management, making it more practical and motivating for urban residents.
Comments
Post a Comment